Reza Delbaz; Hamed Ebrahimian; Fariborz Abbasi; Arezoo Nazi Ghameshlou
Abstract
The explosive growth of science and the dissemination of various results have confused researchers in various fields. Simple surveys and reviews of results collected in a specific area seem necessary. Meta-analysis as a structured method and using statistical methods aggregate the results of studies ...
Read More
The explosive growth of science and the dissemination of various results have confused researchers in various fields. Simple surveys and reviews of results collected in a specific area seem necessary. Meta-analysis as a structured method and using statistical methods aggregate the results of studies on a subject. In this study, in order to assess the surface and drip fertigation based on crop yield and water and fertilizer productivity, a meta-analysis approach was used. For this purpose, studies of eight databases were recruited, and, after reviewing them, 21 studies had the conditions to enter the meta-analysis. Combined results showed that both surface and drip fertigation methods significantly increased the indicators of crop yield and water and fertilizer productivity. Measuring the effect size of the results for crop yield in surface and drip fertigation methods compared to surface irrigation with traditional fertilization method was equal to 1.32 and 1.25, respectively. The effect size of water productivity for surface and drip fertigation compared to surface irrigation with traditional fertilization methods was 1.24 and 1.74. These values were 2.12 and 1.43, respectively, in terms of fertilizer productivity. Therefore, both surface and drip fertigation methods increase crop yield and water and fertilizer productivity. The results of this study are derived from the quantitative data of preliminary studies, to achieve higher accuracy, it is suggested that further studies be examined by meta-analysis.
Masoud Pourgholam Amiji; Addolmajid Liaghat; Arezoo Nazi Ghameshlou; Mojtaba Khoshravesh
Abstract
The problem of soil salinity exists in the paddy field areas in Iran, especially in the Caspian Sea coastal areas, due to its proximity to the sea and low altitude with saline and shallow water table. Besides, considering that rice is one of the most important strategic crops for economy of Iran ...
Read More
The problem of soil salinity exists in the paddy field areas in Iran, especially in the Caspian Sea coastal areas, due to its proximity to the sea and low altitude with saline and shallow water table. Besides, considering that rice is one of the most important strategic crops for economy of Iran and the people in this area, this research was necessary in order to investigate the possibility of production of rice in the presence of shallow and saline groundwater table. This research was performed as a physical model (insulated metallic lysimeter) in the Meteorological Research Center of College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, in 2017. The complete randomized design included two treatments with shallow water table: FSG and SSG, with fresh (control) and saline water, respectively. The salinity of irrigation water was 0.94 dS/m for both treatments. Moreover, for SSG treatment, the EC of shallow groundwater was 20 dS/m at 40 cm soil depth and was regulated as an artificial recharge. The results of salinity profile in SSG treatment showed that there was almost no mixing of fresh and saline water in interstitial zone (under the hard pan from 30 cm to 40 cm of soil surface). In this manner, there was insignificant effect of salinity in the root zone, because of existing of permanent water layer in rice field and downward water flow, which makes an obstacle for upward flow for saline water. This problem did not affect the rice yield, which didn’t decrease. The results of data analysis confirm this and show that shallow groundwater salinity has no significant effect on the parameters like leaf area index (LAI), root length (RL), plant length (PL), membrane stability index (MSI), chlorophyll (SPAD), relative water content (RWC) and the biomass (BIO). The difference between the performance of the control and the salinity treatments was about 1 to 12 percent, while the grain and biological yield in SSG treatment compared with FSG treatment decreased 3.2% and 4.5 percent, respectively. Therefore, considering the significant leaching of soil after cultivation, the negligible loss of yield and upward movement of saline water in the soil, production of rice and other plants in such areas seems possible. Also, with the help of efficient and effective use of lands with shallow saline groundwater, we can decrease the pressure on conventional soil and water resources.